翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Handleyomys melanotis
・ Handleyomys rhabdops
・ Handleyomys rostratus
・ Handleyomys saturatior
・ Handley–Ederville Road
・ Handline fishing
・ Handling machine (The War of the Worlds)
・ Handling package
・ Handling Ships
・ Handling stolen goods
・ Handling the Undead
・ Handloading
・ Handloom saree
・ Handlovka
・ Handlová
Handly's Lessee v. Anthony
・ Handlyng Synne
・ Handmade
・ Handmade (Hindi Zahra album)
・ Handmade (Jimmy Rankin album)
・ Handmade (The Ongoing Concept album)
・ Handmade Arcade
・ HandMade Films
・ HandMade in America
・ Handmade jewelry
・ Handmaiden
・ Handmaids of the Sacred Heart of Jesus
・ Handman
・ Handmann
・ Handmark


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Handly's Lessee v. Anthony : ウィキペディア英語版
Handly's Lessee v. Anthony

''Handly's Lessee v. Anthony'', 18 U. S. 374 (1820), is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the proper boundary between the states of Indiana and Kentucky was the low-water mark on the western and northwestern bank of the Ohio River. Motion by the plaintiff, Handly's lessee, to eject inhabitants of a peninsula in the Ohio River (which was at times temporarily cut off from Indiana by high water) was denied.
==Background==

In 1606, shortly before colonization began, James I of England granted the Charter of 1606 to the newly established Virginia Company, asserting royal title to Native American-occupied land between the 34th and 45th latitudes and inland, and permitting the Virginia Company to establish colonies there.〔Hubbard, ''American Boundaries: The Nation, the States, the Rectangular Survey,'' 2009, p. 7-9.〕 The Virginia Company's subsidiary, the Plymouth Company, was given title to land between the 38th and 45th parallel, while another subsidiary, the London Company, was given title to land between the 34th and 41st parallels.〔Hubbard, ''American Boundaries: The Nation, the States, the Rectangular Survey,'' 2009, p. 8-9.〕 The charter created a conflicting title to the overlapping area between the 38th and 41st parallels, but since no colonies were planned for the area the conflict did not initially create problems.〔 In 1609, James I redefined the Colony of Virginia's boundaries so that the northern boundary projected northwest from the coast, as well as asserting title to all land west to the Pacific Ocean.〔Hubbard, ''American Boundaries: The Nation, the States, the Rectangular Survey,'' 2009, p. 10-11.〕
Conflicting land claims as well as claims that land grants extended to the Pacific Ocean proved highly contentious issues after the American Revolution. To help resolve the issue, in 1781 Virginia agreed to surrender to the United States federal government all title to its land claims west of the Ohio River.〔Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderland, ''American Passages: A History of the United States,'' 2009, p. 174.〕 In making its cession, Virginia defined as its border the Ohio River, and required that Congress use the river as a border between the nascent state of Kentucky and any states fashioned out of the unsettled territory to the north.〔''Handly's Lessee v. Anthony'', 18 U. S. 374, 376-377.〕 Title was transferred in 1784, and the United States Congress passed the Land Ordinance of 1784, Land Ordinance of 1785, and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 to turn these lands into territories and (eventually) states.〔Miller, ''Native America, Discovered and Conquered: Thomas Jefferson, Lewis & Clark, and Manifest Destiny,'' 2006, p. 62.〕 The Northwest Ordinance created the Northwest Territory, which encompassed the modern states of Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, and a portion of Minnesota.〔Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderland, ''American Passages: A History of the United States,'' 2009, p. 176.〕 Kentucky remained unorganized, but its statehood was considered imminent. After 10 constitutional conventions and three statehood enabling acts passed by the Virginia legislature, Kentucky was admitted as a state on June 1, 1792.〔Harrison, ''Kentucky's Road to Statehood,'' 1992, p. 19-90〕 In preparation for Ohio statehood, the area encompassed by the modern state of Ohio was separated from the Northwest Territory on July 4, 1800, and the remaining territory renamed the Indiana Territory.〔Esarey, ''A History of Indiana From Its Exploration to 1850,'' 1915, p. 154.〕 The area that is now the modern state of Michigan was separated from the Indiana Territory in 1805 and incorporated as the Territory of Michigan.〔Utley, Cutcheon, and Burton, ''Michigan as a Province, Territory and State,'' 1906, p. 141-144.〕 But with settlement of the area rapidly increasing, the area comprising the modern state of Indiana was reorganized in 1809 as the "Indiana Territory," with the remainder of the old Indiana Territory to the west organized as the Territory of Illinois.〔Esarey, ''A History of Indiana From Its Exploration to 1850,'' 1915, p. 158-159.〕 Indiana was admitted to statehood on December 9, 1816.〔Esarey, ''A History of Indiana From Its Exploration to 1850,'' 1915, p. 214-219.〕
The Ohio River forms the border between Indiana and Kentucky. At one point, the westward-flowing Ohio River formed a sharp meander, and across the narrowest point of the neck of land ran a dry channel that filled with water only when the river was about above flood stage. Two creeks emptied this channel (flowing northwest), and two other creeks ran eastward and westward along the channel to empty into the Ohio River. The peninsula formed by the meander was settled, and the individuals living there long believed themselves to be under the jurisdiction of the state of Indiana.〔Except for the first parenthetical note, this description is taken from the undisputed facts as described by Chief Justice Marshall. ''Handly's Lessee v. Anthony'', 18 U. S. 374, 375-376.〕 On January 27, 1810, the state of Kentucky enacted legislation asserting title over the river bed and all islands in the river up to the northwest bank of the Ohio River. Consequently, Kentucky granted to Handly title to the peninsula in question. Handly subsequently leased this land to a tenant, who brought suit against Anthony, a citizen of Indiana who had been granted title to the land by that state. Handly's lessee sought to have Anthony ejected from the land.
The district court held for the defendant Anthony, and plaintiff Handly's lessee appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Handly's Lessee v. Anthony」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.